ABB vs KUKA: Key differences, strengths, and which to choose

September 3, 2024
Standard Bots robot visualizer

What are ABB and KUKA robots?

These two companies have been shaping the automation landscape for decades. 

Let's take a closer look at what sets them apart:

ABB

ABB is a Swiss-Swedish multinational corporation officially formed in 1988 from the merger of two companies, ASEA (founded in 1883) and BBC (founded in 1891).

ABB Robotics offers:

  • Versatility: From small payload handlers to heavy-duty lifters
  • State-of-the-art tech: Pioneering software and AI integration for smarter bots
  • Global reach: With a presence in over 53 countries

KUKA

KUKA was founded in 1898 in Germany and has grown into a robotics giant. 

They bring to the table:

  • High precision: Known for their accuracy in automotive and aerospace industries
  • Collaborative innovations: Leaders in human-robot cooperation
  • Industry 4.0 focus: Driving the future of smart factories

ABB vs KUKA: Main differences 

Now, let's break down how these robotic titans stack up against each other in key areas:

  • Brand focus: ABB zeroes in on precision and flexibility, while KUKA prides itself on innovation and adaptability.
  • Performance: Both brands deliver high-speed, accurate movements, but ABB often edges out in repeatability for ultra-precise tasks. If you’re in industries like microchip manufacturing, for instance, you should mind that. 
  • Industry sweet spots: ABB shines in automotive and electronics manufacturing, whereas KUKA dominates in aerospace and medical applications.
  • Collaborative: KUKA's LBR iiwa series leads in human-robot collaboration, but ABB's YuMi is catching up fast. However, they’re both getting beaten out in that category by robots such as RO1 by Standard Bots

ABB vs KUKA: Which offers better precision and speed?

When it comes to precision and speed, both ABB and KUKA are top contenders. But now it’s time for the old head-to-head. 

Let’s take a look: 

  • Precise to a fault: ABB robots often achieve a repeatability of ±0.02mm, while many KUKA models offer around ±0.04mm. However, precision can vary across different models within both brands. 
  • Quick moves: KUKA leads in joint speeds for certain models, reaching up to 720°/s, while ABB’s fastest joints typically reach around 450°/s, though speeds can vary by model and application. 
  • Application: ABB excels in high-precision jobs like electronics assembly, while KUKA excels in rapid material handling.
  • Consistency: ABB's PathAccuracy feature ensures smoother motion, which is perfect for complex welding or painting jobs.
  • The speedster: KUKA's advanced motion planning algorithms give it an edge in pick-and-place operations, boosting cycle times.
Standard Bots routine editor

Comparing payload capacity and reach

When it comes to heavy lifting and reaching far corners, ABB and KUKA both bring their A-game. But how are they in a toe-to-toe powerlifting competition?

Let’s take a look: 

  • Heavyweights: ABB's robots can handle loads up to 800 kg, while KUKA robots can handle loads of up to 1300 kg, depending on the model, making them leaders in heavy-duty applications.
  • Reach for the stars: KUKA takes the lead with robots reaching up to 3.9m, compared to ABB's 3.5m range.
  • Best-fit scenarios: ABB is great for precise, mid-range tasks and is perfect for electronics assembly. KUKA's long reach and heavy lifting make it ideal for automotive manufacturing.
  • Versatility: Both brands offer a wide range of models to suit various payloads and reach, so you're covered whether you need a handy assistant or a strong-as-an-ox performer.

Software and ease of programming

Both companies offer strong software options. 

Let's dive into the major differences between their platforms:

  • The easiest of the two: ABB's RobotStudio boasts an intuitive design that's easy to navigate.
  • Simulation capabilities: KUKA.Sim allows for detailed virtual testing of robot movements and processes.
  • Customization options: Both platforms offer extensive APIs and coding flexibility for tailored solutions.
  • Learning curve: ABB's software is often praised for its gentler learning curve, which makes it more accessible to newcomers — although they’ll still need some tech know-how. 
  • Industry-specific tools: KUKA has specialized add-ons for sectors like automotive and aerospace.
  • Online vs offline programming: Both offer pretty robust offline programming, but KUKA's online programming features are particularly strong.

Flexibility and adaptability for different industries

Both ABB and KUKA robots are A-players when it comes to versatility across sectors. 

Now let’s see how they stack up in various industries: 

  • Car assembly lines: ABB and KUKA robots have proven their mettle (or is it metal?) here, handling everything from welding to painting.
  • Electronics manufacturing: Precision is the name of the game, and both brands deliver with nimble, accurate movements.
  • Food and drink: From packaging to palletizing, these robots adapt to strict hygiene requirements.
  • Pharma production: Clean room compatibility makes ABB and KUKA robots ideal for sensitive environments.
  • Customization options: Both offer software platforms that let you tweak robot behavior on the fly, perfect for changing production needs or mixed product lines. And really, production needs to change with the wind these days. 

Cost considerations and long-term ROI

The initial price tag matters, but so do ongoing costs. Let's dive into the key factors that influence your wallet in the long run:

  • Upfront investment: ABB and KUKA offer different pricing structures, so compare apples to apples. For instance, an ABB YuMi Robot typically starts around $50,000, while a KUKA LBR can exceed $100,000, depending on the configuration and integration options.
  • Ongoing expenses: Factor in maintenance costs, spare parts, and potential downtime for each brand.
  • Support and training: Consider how each company's support packages and training programs affect your bottom line. Both can substantially increase your costs. 
  • Energy efficiency: Look at power consumption stats to estimate long-term operating costs.
  • Scalability: Evaluate how easily you can expand your robotic system with each brand as your needs grow.

Challenges when choosing between ABB and KUKA

Picking between ABB and KUKA robots isn't always a walk in the park. You might face some hurdles along the way.

Here’s where things may not be rosy: 

  • Fitting in with the gang: Your existing setup might not play nice with the new kid on the block.
  • Mastering the moves: Your team could need time to get the hang of the new robot's quirks.
  • Dealing with downtime: When things go wrong, troubleshooting can be a real headache. Working with authorized maintenance is typically not a cost-effective option for either company. 

Which is better for your automation needs?

Choosing between ABB and KUKA for your automation project isn't a one-size-fits-all decision. Let's break down some key factors to help you decide:

  • Operational requirements: Look at your specific needs and how each brand's robots measure up.
  • ROI timeline: Weigh short-term costs against long-term benefits for both options. Robots typically pay for themselves in the long run (after a few years), so you need to account for that. 
  • Use case fit: Consider how well each brand's offerings align with your particular applications.

Summing up — and a better option

It’s not just about ABB vs. KUKA anymore. RO1 by Standard Bots, the six-axis collaborative robot arm, has emerged as a real contender if you want a precise, adaptable, affordable, and easy-to-use robot.

Let’s take a look at where it beats out the competition: 

  • Mind-blowingly precise: RO1's repeatability of +/- 0.025 mm rivals many standard KUKA models and approaches the precision seen in some of ABB’s high-precision robots. They’re perfect for those tricky tasks that need accuracy.
  • Second-to-none adaptability: RO1 can be mounted anywhere and works with most grippers, giving you unmatched flexibility for different industrial setups.
  • Next-gen AI and no-code simplicity: RO1's cutting-edge AI, similar to GPT-4, and its innovative no-code framework make it super simple to use and customize, even if you're not a coding whiz. This also has even the more streamlined software in ABB models beat hands-down. 
  • Value for money: RO1 is way more affordable than similar models from ABB and KUKA, giving you awesome bang for your buck. Plus, with the option to go with a lease model that comes down to around $5/hour — something that neither KUKA nor ABB offers — it’s just too good of an opportunity to pass up. 
  • Blazing-fast operation: RO1's max joint speed of 435°/s is the best in its class. While there are robots with faster absolute speed, few can move 18 kg so quickly. 
  • Compact and space-saving: RO1's small footprint is perfect for tight spaces, unlike the bulky ABB and KUKA models.
  • Ready to work with your tools: RO1 natively supports many grippers (like OnRobot) and has plenty of ports for your other tools so that you can get started right away.

Bottom line: ABB and KUKA are worthy of their reputations, but RO1's combo of precision, adaptability, smart AI, low price, speed, compact size, and tool compatibility makes it the clear winner for businesses looking for a top-notch robot.

Contact our solutions team today for a 30-day risk-free trial and see how RO1 can level up your shop floor.

Standard Bots equipment manager
Standard Bots camera vision
Press contacts