Back to articles
Table of Contents

Robot accuracy vs. repeatability: What manufacturers need to know in 2025

Explainer
September 1, 2025

Robot accuracy is the foundation of industrial automation, and along with repeatability, it separates high-end industrial robots from hobby machines. 

In manufacturing, even a 0.1 mm error in positioning can ruin a weld, misalign an assembly, or cause costly product defects.

Understanding the difference between accuracy and repeatability, how they’re defined, tested, and why they matter, is key to knowing what robots can and cannot reliably do on the factory floor. Accuracy shapes everything from welding to microchip assembly, and certain robots are designed specifically to deliver the extreme precision these tasks demand.

What is accuracy in robotics?

Robot accuracy refers to how closely a robot can reach a commanded or programmed position. In simple terms, it’s how well the robot’s actual movements line up with what you told it to do. A highly accurate robot will hit the exact spot every time, while a less accurate one will land a little off target.

There are several dimensions of robot accuracy:

  • Robot absolute accuracy: This measures how well a robot can move to a commanded location anywhere within its working envelope. This is often what engineers mean when they talk about how “accurate” a robot is overall.
  • Robot pose accuracy: Beyond just reaching a location, pose accuracy considers both position and orientation. A robot might reach the right spot, but if its tool is angled incorrectly, even by fractions of a degree, the result could be a misaligned weld or assembly error.
  • Robot position accuracy: This focuses specifically on the X, Y, Z coordinates of the robot’s endpoint. Position accuracy is especially important in pick-and-place operations or material handling, where even small deviations can slow down workflows.

Accuracy errors in these areas can add up quickly, which is why industrial robots are designed with far tighter tolerances than consumer or hobby machines. Part of the reason they’ve become so central to modern factories and automation systems is discussed in many facts about robots.

What is repeatability in robotics?

In robotics, repeatability refers to a robot's ability to consistently return to the same position or trajectory when commanded to do so multiple times under the same conditions.

In a repeatability test, the arm returns to the same weld spot 100 times. If the hits stay within a tiny margin, repeatability is high, even if the spot is slightly offset from the programmed point. 

There are a few ways repeatability shows up in real-world robotics:

  • Robot arm repeatability: The ability of the arm to return to the same weld spot, drill hole, or assembly point without drifting.
  • Repeatability in robotics: Often the single most important metric for tasks like packaging, pick-and-place, or automated inspection, where precision placement matters more than true positioning accuracy.

In many plants, reliability matters more than pure accuracy. Manufacturers highlight repeatability as a core spec because it measures consistency, not closeness to the target.

Accuracy vs. repeatability: What’s the difference?

Aspect Accuracy Repeatability
Definition How close the robot gets to the actual programmed target How consistently the robot can return to the same position, even if it’s slightly off
Analogy (darts) Darts land on the bullseye Darts cluster tightly together, even if off the bullseye
Poor performance Darts miss the bullseye Darts are spread out all over the board
Good performance Darts hit the bullseye The Darts group is tightly clustered in one spot
Real-world example Pick-and-place robots in electronics assembly need high accuracy to place chips exactly where they belong Welding robots rely on repeatability so they can hit the same weld point every time, even if slightly offset

How is robot accuracy measured?

Tools like laser interferometers, vision tracking, and on-site checks measure accuracy and guide calibration, but ISO 9283 measures robot repeatability. Engineers rely on these formal standards and specialized tools to get reliable results.

International standards

The most widely used benchmark is ISO 9283, which defines how to test robot performance. It includes procedures for a robot repeatability test, where the robot is commanded to return to the same point many times, so engineers can measure how much variation occurs.

Testing methods

  • Laser interferometers: These use beams of light to measure distance with extreme precision. By comparing the commanded position to the measured one, engineers can detect tiny errors that would be impossible to see with the naked eye.
  • Vision-based tracking: High-resolution cameras track the robot’s tool tip against fixed reference markers. If the robot drifts or misses its mark, the software quickly spots the gap between the intended and actual position.
  • On-site performance checks: Instead of relying only on lab tests, manufacturers often run simple checks on the shop floor. For example, the robot may be asked to return to a fixture or mark on a workpiece dozens of times to confirm its system accuracy in real-world conditions.

Together, these methods provide a clear picture of whether the robot is performing within specification. And when results start to drift, robot calibration is used to bring accuracy back in line.

Factors that impact robot accuracy

Factors impacting robot accuracy include calibration drift, temperature, load and EOAT accuracy, and integration. Even the most advanced robots don’t maintain perfect accuracy forever. 

The most common ones are:

  • Calibration drift: Robots rely on sensors and encoders to know where their joints and tools are in space. Over time, tiny shifts in these systems build up, so the robot’s “internal map” no longer matches reality. Without recalibration, it may start missing its marks.
  • Temperature variation: Metals expand when hot and contract when cold. In robots that run constantly, this heating and cooling can change the length of arms or joints just enough to reduce accuracy. Even fractions of a millimeter make a difference in tasks like welding or assembly.
  • Load and tooling accuracy: The tool a robot carries at the end of its arm (EOAT) affects how precise it can be. A heavier gripper might cause the arm to sag slightly, while a tool with a bit of looseness will shift every time it’s used. Both issues reduce overall precision.
  • Integration with CNC machines: When a robot works with CNC equipment, there’s very little room for error. If the robot is even slightly off when loading or unloading a part, the machine may cut in the wrong spot or reject the piece entirely. That’s why matching the robot’s accuracy to the positioning accuracy and repeatability of CNC machines is important.

These factors show why accuracy isn’t just about the robot itself; the environment, workload, and tools all play a role. That’s especially true for fast-moving systems like high-speed pick-and-place robots, where even the smallest shift can cause a big production issue.

Improving robot accuracy and repeatability

The balance between speed, payload, and precision also depends on the design of the robot itself. Some robot models are built for heavy lifting, others for high-speed movement, and some for fine-detail accuracy. Robot design sets the balance between speed, payload, and precision. 

Diagram showing four methods to improve robot accuracy and repeatability.

Some of the most effective methods include:

  • Calibration methods: Over time, small shifts in sensors and joints create errors, much like a clock drifting if it isn’t reset. Calibration realigns the robot with the real world so its programmed positions match where it actually moves. This can be done through absolute calibration, which resets the robot against fixed reference points, or joint calibration, which fine-tunes each axis.
  • Software and firmware updates: Software drives accuracy as much as hardware, refining motion planning and error correction. Updates can refine motion planning, add smarter error correction, and fix control bugs, helping the robot achieve greater consistency without any physical changes.
  • Mechanical upgrades: Hardware improvements such as higher-resolution encoders, stronger actuators, or stiffer joints directly boost accuracy. These upgrades are especially useful when older robots are repurposed for tasks that demand tighter tolerances.
  • Real-time compensation with AI: Some advanced robots use sensors to monitor their movements as they happen. AI algorithms compare the actual motion against the intended one and make small corrections instantly. This allows the robot to correct itself in real time, which is especially useful in industries where even tiny errors can be costly.

Real-world examples of high-accuracy robots

Accuracy and repeatability aren’t just abstract performance specs. They directly shape how robots are used in different industries.

 A few examples include:

  • UR3 cobot: With ±0.1 mm repeatability, the UR3 is commonly used in environments that require high consistency. Its compact size makes it ideal for assembling tiny components, handling electronics, or supporting lab automation, where even the smallest error can cause problems. Because it can repeat the same action with almost no variation, it’s trusted in environments where precision is critical.
  • Sorting robots: In modern warehouses, these robots are responsible for identifying, picking, and placing thousands of packages each day. If items are misplaced, delivery times slow down, and error rates increase. High accuracy ensures each item ends up in the correct bin or location, while strong repeatability keeps operations running smoothly without constant human intervention.
  • High-speed pick-and-place robots: These systems are built for speed, but they cannot compromise on precision. In electronics manufacturing, for example, a robot may need to place chips on circuit boards in exactly the right spot thousands of times per hour. The same level of consistency is required in food packaging, where products must be positioned neatly for sealing and shipping.
  • Industrial robots in manufacturing: Robots used in welding, machining, and assembly depend on accuracy to make strong joints and precise fits. Repeatability ensures that every part produced meets the same standard, which is why these robots are indispensable in industries like automotive and aerospace manufacturing.

Why accuracy and repeatability matter for industries

Accuracy and repeatability matter because they define how much manufacturers can rely on robots. They affect quality, efficiency, and safety across industries, from welding and assembly to microchip fabrication and pharmaceuticals, where consistent precision determines whether automation adds value or creates costly errors.

Infographic illustrating the importance of accuracy and repeatability in three industries: welding and assembly for precise alignment and consistent joints, semiconductor manufacturing for sub-micron precision in microchip production, and pharmaceuticals for accurate ingredient measurement and packaging consistency.
Diagram showing how accuracy and repeatability support welding, semiconductor manufacturing, and pharmaceuticals.

The impact can be seen clearly in areas such as:

  • Welding and assembly: In automotive and heavy manufacturing, accuracy ensures parts line up exactly where they should and welds are placed in the right spot. Repeatability makes sure every joint is produced the same way, which is critical when a factory is turning out thousands of identical units.
  • Semiconductor manufacturing: Building microchips requires robots to work at extreme precision. Handling wafers and placing components requires sub-micron repeatability. Even a small slip can ruin an entire batch of chips, which is why this industry pushes robots to their technical limits.
  • Pharmaceuticals: In medicine production, accuracy ensures the right amount of an ingredient is measured and dispensed. Repeatability guarantees that every vial, blister pack, or container is filled and sealed the same way, meeting both safety standards and regulatory requirements.

Even in less demanding fields, accuracy and repeatability determine whether automation can be trusted to perform consistently. A manipulator robot, for instance, depends on these qualities to move and position parts correctly.


Next steps with Standard Bots

Looking to upgrade your automation game? Standard Bots’ RO1 is the perfect six-axis cobot addition to any CNC setup, delivering unbeatable precision and flexibility.

  • Affordable and adaptable: RO1 costs $37K (list price). Get high-precision automation at half the cost of traditional robots.
  • Precision and power: With a repeatability of ±0.025 mm and an 18 kg payload, RO1 handles even the most demanding CNC jobs.
  • AI-driven simplicity: Equipped with AI capabilities on par with GPT-4, RO1 integrates seamlessly with CNC systems for advanced automation.
  • Safety-first design: Machine vision and collision detection mean RO1 works safely alongside human operators.

Book your on-site demo with our engineers today and see how RO1 can bring AI-powered greatness to your shop floor.

FAQs

1. What design features will guarantee that the robot’s movements are accurate and repeatable?

Features that guarantee that the robot’s movements stay accurate and repeatable are high-precision gears, rigid kinematics, lightweight but stiff materials, and advanced encoders. Regular calibration and maintenance are also necessary to keep these features working as intended.

2. How is a robot’s absolute positioning accuracy measured in practice?

A robot’s absolute positioning accuracy is measured by comparing the robot's actual end effector position to its commanded or programmed position, often using tools such as laser interferometers or vision-based systems. The difference between the two gives the absolute accuracy.

3. Which ISO standard defines the procedure for testing robot repeatability?

The ISO standard that defines the procedure for testing robot repeatability is ISO 9283:1998, titled Manipulating industrial robots: Performance criteria and related test methods. It outlines performance criteria such as accuracy and repeatability and specifies the methods for measuring them. This standard is widely used by manufacturers and integrators to benchmark robot performance and ensure systems meet required tolerances.

4. How often should a production-line robot be calibrated to prevent accuracy drift?

A production-line robot should typically be calibrated at least once a year to prevent accuracy drift. In high-precision environments or when robots face heavy workloads, more frequent calibration may be necessary to maintain reliable performance.

5. What on-site methods can I use to test robot repeatability without access to specialized laboratories?

On-site methods to test robot repeatability include programming the robot to return to a fixed reference point, such as a pin, mark, or fixture, and checking how close it comes after multiple cycles. This reveals repeatability issues without advanced equipment.

6. Can software and firmware updates alone improve a robot’s positioning accuracy?

Software and firmware updates can only improve a robot’s positioning accuracy to a point. They improve motion control, fix bugs, and add better error compensation. However, mechanical and sensor limitations still set the baseline for accuracy.

7. How does temperature variation impact a robot’s accuracy during long shifts?

Temperature variation impacts a robot’s accuracy through thermal expansion and sensor changes, which can cause positional drift and reduce repeatability over long shifts. 

These shifts are often subtle but add up during continuous operation, especially in tasks requiring high precision. To counter this, many systems use thermal compensation or schedule recalibration to keep performance stable.

Join thousands of creators
receiving our weekly articles.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.